Due to the rapidly changing application and modifications of duty rates, please note that Deringer is not responsible for coordinating the timing of U.S. entry and imposed tariff rates.
Priority Actions for Customers
-
Due to the implementation of new tariffs on U.S. imports, A.N. Deringer, Inc. will require advance payment for any new duties. We encourage clients to set up their own ACH accounts to pay Customs and Border Protection (CBP) directly. To avoid shipment holds and delays, customers should contact us before booking or sending shipments affected by the new tariffs.
-
If you do not have your own Customs Automated Clearing House (ACH) Account, we strongly recommend that you apply for it as soon as possible.
-
If you have your own ACH Account, verify your transaction limits with your bank now. Insufficient transaction limits will cause your bank to reject Customs payments.
-
Check and adjust your bond limits to ensure your bond is sufficient. The new tariffs may saturate your limit very quickly.
Stay Informed: Tariff Updates Continue
Section 232: Aluminum and Steel Import Resources
One of the more complex and evolving regulatory developments, Section 232 tariffs were recently expanded to include 407 HTS provisions effective August 18, 2025.
Section 232 entry requires verification from importers’ suppliers to report the primary country of smelt/cast. If a country that is not known to have smelting capabilities is listed on a U.S. entry, that could be a red flag for CBP. Given the increased focus on tariff evasion and enforcement by the regulatory authorities, we suggest importers use this Country Smelt Dashboard provided by the International Trade Administration (ITA) to double check the information provided by suppliers and noted on the entry.
Another helpful tool from ITA is a Melt/Pour Dashboard. This tool is somewhat different than the Country Smelt tool noted above, as it uses a world map showing U.S. imports by country of melt/pour, providing another reference and verification of data provided by suppliers.
Additional websites from ITA on steel/aluminum that importers may wish to reference include:
Trade Alerts Recap
We provide up-to-date information on tariffs and new policies through Trade Alerts. Here's some of the latest news:
Request for public comments and notice of public hearing
On September 16th, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) released a Federal Register Notice requesting public comments relating to the trade agreement between the United States, Mexico, and Canada (USMCA) in advance of the joint review of the agreement scheduled for July 1,2026. As directed by Congress, USTR is seeking public comments regarding the operation of the Agreement, including comments on the operation of the North American Competitiveness Committee.
The deadline to submit comments and request to appear at the hearing is November 3, 2025, at 11:59 p.m. EST. The request to appear must include a summary of testimony.
The public hearing will take place on November 17,2025, at 10am in the U.S. International Trade Commission building, located in Washington D.C.
To learn more, view the Federal Register Notice here.
Quick Reminder for Importers
The U.S. Department of Commerce issued a notice yesterday serving as a reminder that reciprocal tariffs on all Japanese-origin goods will be effective today, Tuesday, September 16, 2025. Subsequently, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued Cargo Systems Messaging Service (CSMS) No. 66242844 explaining the implementation of the US/Japan modification of the US/Japan Agreement. The key issues detailed within the recent CSMS #66242844 include:
- The United States will apply a baseline 15 percent tariff on nearly all Japanese imports entering the United States, alongside separate sector-specific treatment for automobiles, automobile parts, civil aircraft and aerospace products.
- On September 15, 2025, Commerce posted the implementing notice, Implementing Certain Tariff-Related Elements of the United States-Japan Agreement, with the relevant HTSUS modifications and 99 numbers for public inspection on the Federal Register’s website, with a scheduled publication date of September 16, 2025.
- As an update to the guidance issued through CSMS 66146676 “Interim Guidance: Retroactive Implementation of the US-Japan Agreement”, filers can update their previously filed entries to apply the newly issued tariff rates. The new rates shall apply retroactively to products of Japan that are entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on August 7, 2025.
For additional details on the trade deal with Japan, please refer to our Trade Alert dated September 9, 2025.
On August 29, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the President the authority to impose specific import tariffs. Following this ruling, on September 9, the U.S. Supreme Court released an order that it will hear two pending cases (Learning Resources, Inc. et al. v. Trump, President of U.S., et al. (No. 24-1287) and Trump, President of U.S., et al. v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al. (No. 25-250)) challenging the legality of the issuance of President Trump’s IEEPA tariffs. The deadline for filing briefs to the Supreme Court for these cases is October 30. For now, the IEEPA duties will remain in effect.
What does this mean for your company?
Unfortunately, this is uncharted territory, and we do not yet know the outcome of the IEEPA case.
Here are some options to consider:
• Monitor: It is crucial to track transactions and liquidation status where the IEEPA duties have been paid.
• Extension of Liquidation: A request to extend liquidation for affected entries can be submitted, but approval is not guaranteed. If CBP does not approve the extension and the entry liquidates, the next option is to file a protest.
• Protective Protest: If the entry has been liquidated, one option is to submit a formal protest against the liquidation to potentially preserve the right to a refund.
• File a lawsuit with the Court of International Trade (CIT): Importers can file legal action with the CIT to challenge the validity of the IEEPA tariffs.
• Take no action pending the Supreme Court Ruling: The case is now under expedited review by the Supreme Court, currently set to be heard the first week of November 2025. Importers can decide to wait and see if the Supreme Court upholds the CAFC ruling before determining a course of action.
Please note that Post Summary Correction (PSC) filings cannot currently be submitted for unliquidated entries that remove IEEPA tariffs. However, this may change in the future if the Supreme Court upholds the CAFC ruling.
It is currently unclear whether refunds will be issued if importers do not take action on the affected entries in the event that the Supreme Court declares these tariffs illegal. We recommend consulting with a trade attorney to determine your company’s best course of action.
Modified Reciprocal Tariffs Exclusion List
On Friday, September 5th, President Trump issued a new Executive Order (EO) modifying EO 14257, which was originally released in April to establish Trump’s “reciprocal tariff” program. As noted by trade attorney Michael Roll, “In EO 14257, Trump had created a list of products, which were listed in Annex II of EO 14257 (and are currently listed in US Note 2(v)(iii) to Subchapter III of Chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)) that were specifically excluded from the reciprocal tariffs created by EO 14257 through use of HTSUS subheading 9903.01.32.”
The EO issued on Friday added new products to EO 14257 (thereby excluding these goods from reciprocal tariffs), while also removing products from Annex II (thereby making these products subject to the reciprocal tariffs).
You can view the full list of HTSUS codes for impacted products here.
These changes took effect yesterday on September 8th, for entries filed after 12:01 am EDT. Please view CSMS Message 66151866 for further details.
Retroactive Refunds of Reciprocals for Japanese-Origin Goods
On Thursday, September 4th, the Trump Administration issued a separate EO implementing the trade agreement with Japan. This new EO sets a cap of 15% on reciprocal tariffs for Japanese-origin goods. Under this framework, if the HTS chapter 1-97 rate for a Japanese product is 15% or higher, no reciprocal tariff applies. If the HTS chapter 1-97 rate is below 15%, the reciprocal tariff equals the difference between that rate and 15%. For example, a product with a HTS chapter 1-97 rate of 3% would have a 12% reciprocal tariff rate. Before the September 4 EO, CBP had been applying a 15% reciprocal tariff on top of the HTS chapter 1-97 rate.
As stated by Michael Roll,
“The new EO makes the 15% cap effective retroactive to August 7, 2025 and allows importers to apply for refunds via standard customs procedures (i.e., post summary corrections (PSCs) and protests). However, CBP immediately issued CSMS Message 66146676 advising imports to NOT file PSCs or protests until CBP issues further guidance and instructions.
Separately, the September 4th EO removed reciprocal and Section 232 aluminum, steel, and copper tariffs entirely from Japanese origin goods used in aerospace and that qualify for the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft. For autos and auto parts, the September 4th EO also eliminated the Section 232 auto and auto parts tariffs on goods whose regular rate of duty is 15% or more. For goods whose regular rate of duty is less than 15%, Section 232 auto and auto part tariff rates are now set at the difference between the regular rate and 15% (similar to the reciprocal tariff math described above)
Lastly, the September 4th EO directed the Commerce Secretary to modify the reciprocal tariff rate to zero for products that are natural resource unavailable (or unavailable at sufficient scale to satisfy domestic demand) in the United States, generic pharmaceuticals, generic pharmaceutical ingredients, and generic pharmaceutical precursors.”
Please Note:
While we aim to ensure customers are informed of these recent changes, we are currently awaiting official guidance from CBP to ensure shipments are processed in full compliance with the updated requirements.
On August 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that overturned the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The court found these tariffs exceeded presidential authority due to their broad scope and indefinite duration.
Despite the ruling, the tariffs are still being collected while litigation continues. The court also raised doubts about whether IEEPA allows for tariffs at all, though it stopped short of making a final decision.
We are monitoring developments of this case closely and will continue to keep you informed as new information emerges.
Section 301 Exclusions
On May 31, 2025, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) granted a three-month extension of certain exclusions from the China Section 301 tariffs. This extension expires on August 31, 2025. Read the official USTR Notice.
Tariff on Indian Imports
Effective on August 27, 2025, the United States will impose an additional 25% ad valorem tariff on imports of Indian products. This is in addition to the 25% reciprocal tariff, which took effect on August 7, 2025. View more details in our previous trade alert.
Section 321 Exemption Suspended
On July 30, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order suspending the de minimis exemption for commercial shipments globally, effective on August 29, 2025. As a result, imported goods sent through means other than the international postal network that are valued at or under $800 and that would otherwise qualify for the de minimis exemption will be subject to all applicable duties.
For more information on this Executive Order, listen to the recent episode of our podcast Time Out for Trade, where Amy Magnus, Director of Customs Affairs & Compliance, explains the implications of the de minimis suspension. Watch it here.
Canada to Remove Tariffs on US Goods Covered by CUSMA
On August 22, 2025, the Canadian Government announced plans to eliminate tariffs on US goods that are covered by the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), effective September 1, 2025. Canada’s 25% counter-tariffs on US steel, aluminum, and automotives will remain in place for now. The full statement from the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada can be found here.
On August 15, 2025, the Trump Administration greatly expanded the list of goods subject to 50% tariff included within Section 232 Aluminum and Steel duties. This is a significant development that U.S. importers should take note of, since the new list of HTS codes now includes a large number of products previously not considered steel or aluminum derivatives. These duties are now required (August 18, 2025), and the provision does not include exceptions for goods in transit.
As noted by attorney Michael Roll:
"Many of these new HTS provisions would not normally be considered aluminum or steel derivative products ... at least not by any reasonable understanding of those words. For example... the list of goods now subject to the aluminum and steel tariffs include items as diverse as dairy products (0402), food preparations (2106), petroleum oils (2710), and certain chemicals, etc. While the 50% tariff will only apply to the aluminum/steel aspects of these goods (which will presumably be just certain aluminum and steel packaging or container type materials), it shows just how broad this administration intends to throw its tariff net".
Roll also states:
"Importers will recall that earlier this year the Trump Administration significantly expanded the list of products considered to be "steel derivative" and "aluminum derivative" products. The historic expansion of the 232 tariffs on aluminum and steel derivative products was only the beginning of the tariff nightmare for importers and brokers. The White House also allowed private parties to petition the Department of Commerce to include more products as aluminum and steel derivative products.
Under the "inclusion" process, the Department of Commerce created a process where every May, September and January, it will open up a two (2) week submission window to allow companies to ask for additional products to be included as aluminum or steel derivative products subject to the 50% tariff. The public will then have 2 weeks to review and comment on such proposals and Commerce will act on the petitions and comments within 60 days. See here for the relevant Federal Register notice.
On May 1, 2025, Commerce opened the first submission window. Over 50 companies asked Commerce to include hundreds of additional HTSUS classifications as aluminum and steel derivative products. On May 20, 2025, Commerce posted the petitions to regulations.gov, thereby starting the 14 day window for importers and the public to comment. The deadline for submitting comments was June 4, 2025. Friday's announcement represents the culmination of this first inclusion process. Next month, another window will open for parties to request even further expansion of the aluminum and steel tariff coverage."
To further aid our customers and partners, Deringer has compiled the government's list of additional products into a user-friendly Excel file. The Unofficial New Expanded Section 232 Derivative List of August 15, 2025 may be downloaded from our Forms page.
Source: Michael Roll, Roll & Harris LLP
On August 6, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order imposing an additional 25% ad valorem tariff on Indian product imports into the United States, effective 12:01 a.m. ET on August 27, 2025. This action is in response to India’s continued importation of Russian oil amid ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
This tariff is in addition to the 25% reciprocal tariff scheduled to take effect on August 7, 2025. Exceptions apply to goods that:
-
Were loaded and in transit prior to 12:01 a.m. ET on August 27, and
-
Are entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse before 12:01 a.m. ET on September 17, 2025.
Per the EO, the additional duty will not apply to:
-
Articles subject to Section 232 actions under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962
-
Articles excepted by 50 U.S.C. 1702(b)
-
Articles listed in Annex II of Executive Order 14257 (April 2, 2025), as amended
Goods admitted into a Foreign Trade Zone on or after August 27 must be entered under privileged foreign status, unless eligible for domestic status under 19 CFR 146.43.
A. N. Deringer, Inc. will continue to monitor developments and provide updates as additional guidance becomes available from U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
The U.S. Presidential Administration issued an Executive Order and Fact Sheet addressing new International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) Reciprocal Tariff rates for multiple countries, effective on August 7, 2025.
Key provisions outlined in the Executive Order and Fact Sheet include:
-
There are two groups addressed in this Order:
-
Effective August 7th, goods from countries listed in Annex 1 will be subject to tariff rates as shown in the list provided by the White House. (The current IEEPA 10% tariff rate will remain in effect until August 7th for these countries.)
-
Countries that are not listed in Annex 1, will continue to be subjected to a 10% tariff. (This is consistent with IEEPA Reciprocal tariffs published April 2nd.)
-
Brazil is a notable exception – and is currently levied a 10% Reciprocal tariff stacked on the recently announced 40% tariff, for a total of 50%.
-
-
-
There is an in-transit provision importers should note:
-
“Goods loaded onto a vessel at the port of loading and in transit on the final mode of transit before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time [August 7, 2025], and entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on October 5, 2025,” shall not be subject to the new rates, and remain subject to the 10% additional duty.
-
-
The order also addresses transshipments, although a definition of ‘transshipment’ is not yet published:
-
If CBP determines there is a ‘transshipment’, it will be subject to a 40% tariff rate as well as any additional applicable duties, as well as possible fines or penalties.
-
The U.S. Government will also publish circumvention schemes and countries every six months to inform the public, national security reviews, and commercial due diligence.
-
Tariff Status for China, Canada, and Mexico:
-
Recent negotiations between the U.S. and China has not yielded any formal changes, so current duty rates for the country include:
-
10% IEEPA duties
-
20% Fentanyl tariff
-
Section 301 tariffs
-
Section 232 duties
-
Most favored nations tariffs
-
-
On July 31, 2025 Mexico received a 90-day extension for IEEPA negotiations.
-
Effective today, August 1, Canadian goods imported to the U.S. that do not qualify for the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) are now subject to a 35% tariff.
Annex 1
USMCA Goods Remain Exempt
President Trump issued an Executive Order raising the duties on Canadian goods bound for the U.S. from 25% to 35%, effective today, August 1, 2025. The order clearly states that “Goods qualifying for preferential tariff treatment under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) continue to remain not subject to the IEEPA Canada tariffs.”
Another important change noted in the Executive Order raises the tariff on transshipments from 35% to 40%. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued official guidance through its Cargo Systems Messaging Service (CSMS, #65798609) overnight, with guidance on the additional duties on Canadian imports.
Recap of Executive Orders and Proclamations enacted by U.S. President Donald Trump on 7/30/2025
De Minimis Suspension
President Trump signed an Executive Order suspending the de minimis exemption for commercial shipments globally, effective on August 29. This means imported goods sent through means other than the international postal network that are valued at or under $800 and that would otherwise qualify for the de minimis exemption will be subject to all applicable duties.
U.S. Copper Imports Subject to 50% Tariffs
President Trump issued a Proclamation stating that all imports of semi-finished copper products and intensive copper derivative products will be subject to a 50% tariff, effective on August 1st. This measure applies to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. ET on Aug. 1 and will remain in effect, unless such action is expressly reduced, modified, or terminated, according to the Proclamation. The Proclamation also states, “This tariff is in addition to any other duties, fees, exactions, and charges applicable to such imported semi-finished copper products and intensive copper derivative products.”
Tariffs on Brazilian Imports Increased to 50%
President Trump signed an Executive Order implementing an additional 40% tariff on Brazilian products under IEEPA, which brings the total tariff amount to 50%. The Trump Administration cites these tariffs are in response to “recent policies, practices, and actions by the Government of Brazil that constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.”
Major Tariff Changes & Investment Commitments
On July 27, 2025, President Trump and European Commission President von der Leyen announced a new U.S.–E.U. trade agreement with major implications for transatlantic commerce.
The E.U. will eliminate tariffs on U.S. goods and commit to $750 billion in U.S. energy purchases and $600 billion in U.S. investments. In return, the U.S. will reduce tariffs on E.U. goods, including autos, from 30% to 15%. However, steel and aluminum from the E.U. will remain subject to a 50% tariff.
For more information, click here to read the NCBFAA briefing.
Tariff enforcement postponed as negotiations continue
President Trump signed an Executive Order delaying the start of country-specific reciprocal tariffs from July 9 to August 1, 2025, citing ongoing trade talks and updated guidance. He also confirmed that 14 countries received letters warning of tariff hikes above 10% if no deals are reached by August 1, with more countries possibly to follow. These 14 nations represent a significant share of affected U.S. imports, broken down as follows:
1. Japan: 25%
2. South Korea: 25%
3. Tunisia: 25%
4. Malaysia: 25%
5. Kazakhstan: 25%
6. South Africa: 30%
7. Bosnia & Herzegovina: 30%
8. Indonesia: 32%
9. Serbia: 35%
10. Bangladesh: 35%
11. Thailand: 36%
12. Cambodia: 36%
13. Laos: 40%
14. Myanmar: 40%
The President mentioned an agreement with Vietnam, though no details have been released, leaving the nature of the deal open to speculation. He also announced via Truth Social that the U.S. has agreed with China to supply magnets and rare earth elements, and that student visas would be issued to Chinese citizens. Further specifics on both agreements have yet to be disclosed.
The delay affects specific tariff provisions in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS), which will remain suspended until the new effective date. Currently, the separate tariff suspension related to China under Executive Order 14298 remains unchanged.
For more information please visit: Extending the Modification of the Reciprocal Tariff Rates – The White House
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued new guidance on how to report the country of smelt and cast on derivative aluminum imports for products subject to Section 232 aluminum measures when the importer does not know the country of smelt and cast.
Effective June 28, 2025, if the country of smelt and/or cast is unknown for such imports, then the importers should report “unknown” in lieu of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) code for the unknown smelt and cast country.
When reporting “unknown”, importers will be required to report HTS 9903.85.67 or 9903.85.68, as applicable. These entries will be assessed the 200 percent Section 232 duties on imports of aluminum from Russia.
Detailed documents about the accompanying updates in ACE and the Entry Summary Error Dictionary are available on the ACE CATAIR webpage in the Draft Chapters: Future Capabilities section. This effort will deploy to the Certification and Production environments on June 28, 2025. More information related to Section 232 entry filing requirements can be found on the CBP website here.
Currently, we do not know if these changes will apply retroactively. A.N. Deringer, Inc. will continue to monitor the Federal Register, White House, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection official notifications, as well as the alerts posted by our partners and stakeholders, to keep our customers apprised of U.S. tariff changes and relevant policy changes.
Source: CBP
We're here to help
At Deringer, we're here to support our customers and help them to adjust to the new tariffs. Some of our recommendations, like setting up your own ACH account, may take a bit of time, so we’re encouraging prompt action. It's possible Customs may have a significant backlog as well, as we anticipate many importers will need to establish new ACH accounts. We're committed to helping you navigate this new terrain.
Stay informed, be proactive, and position your business for success in this ever-changing trade environment.
Discover methods to avoid, mitigate, and recover costs associated with increased tariffs on imported goods.
View Now Tools for Next StepsTaking proactive steps today will result in lowering your risk profile, enhanced trade compliance, and increase your business's ability to adapt to future challenges.
Jump to Section Don't Forget Your BondsProactively increasing bonds when necessary ensures you are prepared for duty increases and helps you avoid delays at the border.
Jump to Section Join Our WebinarsOur compliance experts and guest speakers provide insight to help you navigate this fluid environment.
View Webinar ScheduleWHAT CAN IMPORTERS DO NOW?
Despite the uncertainty of the timing, scope, and duty rates associated with new tariffs, there are strategic steps importers can take to lower risk, mitigate the impacts of new duties, and build a more resilient supply chain. We are here to help you every step of the way. Here are some of our recommendations:
Tariff / Product Engineering
Discover opportunities to legally classify and declare goods under an HTSUS provision to benefit from a lower duty rate.
Tariff engineering refers to design and manufacturing decisions made in such a way that the manufactured goods are classified with the U.S. HTS numbers that carry lower duty rates.
First, verify your U.S. HTS classification numbers to ensure that your products are classified correctly, and that you are not missing an opportunity for a lower duty rate.
Second, explore opportunities to change your product’s design resulting in a different HTS classification and lower duty rate.
Origin Engineering
Origin engineering focuses on sourcing essential inputs from countries not affected by increased tariffs. By altering key manufacturing steps or changing suppliers, businesses can leverage trade agreements and reduce exposure to higher duties. When exploring import options from various countries, numerous factors must be considered. This proactive approach requires careful planning and execution but offers substantial cost savings.
It is also wise to investigate any benefits from existing trade agreements, as these can provide cost savings and smoother operations. Consider any potential changes to logistics costs or capabilities, as these can influence your overall strategy. Finally, examine the regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and avoid legal hurdles.
As you consider these different strategies, keep in mind the dynamic and unpredictable nature of the new environment. For example, countries with lower tariffs today, may not provide the same opportunities in the near future.
Additional Strategies
- First Sale Strategy: Explore a possibility of lowering your import duties by using the first sale price instead of subsequent higher prices to determine Customs value and calculate duties.
Here is how it works:
When goods are imported, Customs duties and fees are typically calculated based on the transaction value. In many supply chains, products are sold multiple times before reaching their final destination. Where two or more transactions may qualify as “sales for exportation to the United States”, the First Sale Strategy allows importers to use the price paid in the first sale in the supply chain, often between the manufacturer and the middleman, as the basis for duty calculation. This price is often lower than the price in subsequent transactions, which means lower duties and fees. For a transaction to qualify as the First Sale, it has to satisfy numerous requirements.
To successfully adopt the First Sale Strategy, Deringer customers should work closely with an expert to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations. Additionally, maintaining detailed documentation of all transactions and agreements in the supply chain is crucial.
- Value Adjustments: Minimize payments or charges that are not directly related to the production of your goods.
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 codified at 19 U.S.C. 1401a, sets forth the rules for appraisement of imported merchandise. The Act sets forth six different methods of appraisement, and their order of preference. The Act allows for certain deductions from the appraised value.
At its core, value adjustment is about understanding Customs valuation law, using the correct valuation methodology and lowering the declared value by applying allowable deductions.
Tariffs are typically calculated as a percentage of the declared value of the goods being imported. Therefore, by lowering the Customs value, companies can effectively reduce the amount of tariffs they are obligated to pay.
Making value adjustments requires a thorough understanding of the Customs regulations and guidelines. Engaging in this practice necessitates a detailed analysis of invoices and contracts, ensuring that all deductions are compliant with Customs valuation laws. This strategic foresight not only helps in mitigating tariffs but also ensures that businesses remain compliant with international trade regulations, avoiding potential fines, penalties, or liquidated damages.
- Trade Remedy Reviews: Decrease anti-dumping and countervailing duties through administrative reviews, new shipper reviews, or scope rulings. A trade remedy review aims to ensure that these duties remain fair, relevant, and reflective of current market conditions.
Administrative Reviews are periodic assessments that re-evaluate the necessity and rate of existing anti-dumping or countervailing duties. They ensure that the duties correspond to the current level of dumping or subsidization. By participating in an administrative review, companies may demonstrate changes in pricing, cost structures, or market conditions, which could result in a reduction of duties if the original reasons for imposing them have altered.
New Shipper Reviews are tailored for companies that were not originally subject to the duties but have since begun exporting the products in question. By undergoing a new shipper review, these companies can potentially secure a lower duty rate if they can prove that they are not engaged in dumping or benefiting from unfair subsidies.
Scope Rulings determine whether a particular product falls within the scope of an existing trade remedy measure. If a product is found to be outside the scope, it would not be subject to the duties, potentially saving significant costs for the importer or exporter.
By engaging in these reviews, companies can potentially decrease or eliminate the additional costs imposed by trade remedies, thus enhancing their competitiveness in the market. Lowering these duties can significantly reduce the cost of importing goods, translating into savings that can be passed on to consumers or reinvested into the business.
- Deferral Tactics: Explore the use of bonded warehouses, Temporary Import Bonds (TIB), or in-bond movements to defer duty payments.
Bonded warehouses operate in a secured area in which imported dutiable merchandise may be stored, manipulated, or undergo manufacturing operations without payment of duty for up to five years from the date of importation. Goods can remain in these warehouses for extended periods, allowing businesses to defer duty payments until the products are withdrawn for sale or distribution. This not only delays the financial outlay, but also provides flexibility in inventory management and market timing.
Transportation Bonds can be used by importers to avoid making entry and paying duties on goods that are merely transporting through the U.S., as long as certain export or bond cancellation timeframes are met.
Temporary Import Bonds (TIBs) are particularly beneficial for businesses importing goods temporarily for specific purposes, such as exhibitions, repairs, or processing. A TIB allows these goods to enter the country without duty payment, provided they are exported or destroyed within a specific timeframe. This approach helps companies avoid unnecessary duty costs on temporary imports.
Effective Advocacy for Tariff Reduction
Advocacy plays a crucial role in influencing trade policies and securing tariff reductions. Engaging with legislative bodies and regulatory agencies through trade organizations, coalitions and formal requests can lead to favorable outcomes.
Advocacy may take the form of becoming champion for the reduction of tariffs and deregulation through strategic measures such as the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill, executive actions, and legislative or agency rulemakings.
Specifically, there is still time for importers to seek Section 301 Exclusions. Out of 312 subheadings in Chapters 84/85, 164 products remain eligible for exclusions until May 2025. To qualify, requests for exclusions must be submitted by March 31, 2025.
Importers may wish to urge the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and Congress to reinstate a comprehensive exclusion process. Advocate for the renewal of expired exclusions and the implementation of retroactive applications for these exclusions.
KEEP YOUR GOODS MOVING WITH 2025 IMPORTERS’ TOOLS:
Start with Your Overall Finances
Navigating the financial landscape can be daunting, but understanding a few essentials can make all the difference. First and foremost, prioritize having your financials audited. This step provides a transparent and accurate picture of your financial health, which is crucial for making informed decisions.
We suggest simulating various scenarios to understand the potential financial implications. Consider the direct tariff costs that may arise from different countries and at varying rates. Additionally, factor in associated supply chain expenses, including logistics costs such as transportation, warehousing, and freight forwarding.
It is also essential to account for risks stemming from currency fluctuations and the costs involved in hedging against them. Furthermore, evaluate inventory carrying and storage expenses, as well as the costs related to maintaining quality control and ensuring compliance with regulations. Don't overlook the investments needed for supplier development and technology enhancements, as these can significantly impact your overall financial strategy.
First Order of Business: Establish an ACH Account
Due to the unprecedented scope and scale of the new administration’s potential actions, we are advising our clients to obtain their own automated clearing house (ACH) account to guarantee timely duty payments. There are multiple advantages to ACH payment of duties. The primary benefit is the ability to pay duties directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Obtaining an ACH account will also permit you to take advantage of periodic monthly statement (PMS) procedures, which allows payment of duties on a monthly basis.

Establish an ACH Account as soon as possible so that your duty payments are recorded in time.

Download our New Trade Landscape Tariff Tip Sheet and proactively prepare for what's ahead.

Log in to our Analytics tool and begin to estimate possible tariff/duty rates. Learn how to use our Trade Remedy Tool & Amounts Due Tool.

Use this Bond Calculator from our friends at Roanoke to verify your bond limits are sufficient.


Receive notifications of policy and regulatory changes, guidelines, and developments in international trade. Sign up here.

View strategies created by Deringer's Trade Advisory Group to help you reduce duty exposure amidst tariffs.
DON'T FORGET ABOUT YOUR BONDS
.png?width=300&name=Bonds%20Imagery%20(1).png)
What is Bond Saturation?
Generally speaking, continuous Customs bonds are financial guarantees to the U.S. Government and indicate a commitment to comply with U.S. import laws. Importers typically purchase these bonds from specialized insurance companies through their Customs broker. Bonds are required to import to the United States, and are based on the importer’s estimated annual duty, taxes and fees due the U.S. Government. U.S. Customs monitors the size of your bond against your import trends, and will cancel your bond if the limit is exceeded – it becomes ‘saturated’ relative to import trends/activity. If the bond is canceled, imports will not continue – until such time as a new bond is in place.
Deringer anticipates that many importers’ bonds will saturate quickly if the new proposed tariffs are imposed. If an importer’s bond becomes saturated, there is the risk of that CBP may terminate the bond. Without a valid bond in place, imports may not proceed until such time as a new bond is in place. In addition, importers may experience underwriting delays from sureties, due to the high volume of bonds that will saturate. We strongly recommend that importers proactively review their bond limits now.
Securing a sufficient Customs bond is a critical consideration. Proactively increasing bonds when necessary ensures you are prepared for duty increases and avoid delays at the border.
Determine Your Bond Needs
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reviews the sufficiency of continuous bonds on a monthly basis. The bond amount is calculated as 10% of the total duties, fees and taxes paid in the last 12 months. With the anticipated increases in tariffs, it is critical to calculate your bond amount based on the projected amount of duties and fees rather than on prior duty amounts. Failing to make accurate projections and securing an adequate bond amount can have serious consequences including the inability to import into the United States.
Start by anticipating Customs duties and fees you expect to pay in the next 12 months. This includes all duties and fees such as AD/CVD and tariffs under Sections 201, 232, and 301.
-
Once you determine the amount of coverage required by your bond (remember 10% of taxes duties and fees for the next 12 months) you should understand the Rounding Process:
-
For duties and fees ranging from $0 to $1,000,000, your bond amount is rounded up to the nearest $10,000 (note that the minimum Customs bond starts at $50,000).
-
For duties and fees exceeding $1,000,000, the bond amount is rounded up to the nearest $100,000.
-
For example: assuming that an importer currently has a $50,000 bond because in the past their goods have been duty free under a trade agreement. The importer calculates that over the last year they have imported $3,500,000 into the United States. Anticipating additional duties of 25%, this could result in a future duty outlay of $875,000. To calculate the proper bond amount, 10% of the anticipated duties would be $87,500 - and with the bond rounding rules – this results in a $90,000 Customs entry bond.
Comprehensive Coverage
-
Incorporate All Payments: Your calculations should include all paid and payable duties, and dutiable government fees, ensuring no detail is overlooked.
-
Handle Outstanding Bills: Calculate 10% for unpaid or protested bills under 210 days.
-
For delinquent bills over 210 days or denied protests, factor in the full amount.
-
-
Include Unpaid Debit Vouchers: Ensure every aspect of your financial obligations is covered.
We recommend that you use the most recent version of your entry data, guaranteeing up-to-date calculations.
Bond Usage Review
We recommend that all importers proactively review their bond level and forecast if and when their bond may saturate. Waiting for CBP to issue a mandated increase will limit the time to react/obtain a new, larger import bond, so we strongly recommend action as soon as possible. If you believe your company’s import bond may be insufficient, we suggest completing a new import bond application and returning it to us (BondDept@anderinger.com) for processing. (Please note that it is possible that we (and other sureties) will receive a high volume of applications, another reason we recommend importers start now.)
Bond Sufficiency Report
Should Deringer bond clients find they are suddenly paying significant amounts of duties, taxes and fees to U.S. Customs and would like to get a snap shot of their current bond sufficiency, they can contact us at BondDept@anderinger.com and request a bond sufficiency summary report. When doing so, please provide your company’s name and account number.
Financial statements may be required for underwriter review on any bond, but very likely for new import bonds valued at $400,000 or more. When financial statements are required, the underwriters are looking for the importer’s latest complete, year-end financial statement:
-
A year-end financial statement is defined as a 12-month CPA prepared statement which includes, Statement of Income, Balance Sheet, and Statement of Cash Flows and accompanying notes. If the statement is not CPA prepared, the underwriters will require it to be signed by an officer of the company attesting to its accuracy. If the financial statements are not already in English, an English translation must accompany the original version. Also, if the financial statement is over a year old, the underwriters will require additional information.
Termination and Replacement Import Bonds
Importers should be aware that there may be a collateral requirement when terminating/replacing existing bonds. It may take banks up to 30 days to issue a letter of credit (LC) once it has received all of the required information. Should collateral be required by the underwriters to secure the new import bond, it will likely be required to be issued for the face value of the new bond and the underwriters will release the required LC format for processing once the importer has provided the name and address of the U.S. bank they wish to use.
If a General Indemnity Agreement (GIA) is required by the underwriters, the GIA will need to be sign by one of the importer’s officers (CEO/CFO) and witnessed by another party (the witness does not need to be an officer of the corporation).
If a Collateral Release Policy (CRP) is required, it can either be physically signed by a corporate officer (CEO/CFO) or if the importer would prefer sent via DocuSign to the officer who signed the GIA. It is important that if collateral is required that the importer maintain a copy of the signed CRP as it details what must occur before the underwriters will agree to release the collateral at a later date.
Underwriter Requirements
Given the anticipated volume of mandated increased notices, Deringer anticipates delays in underwriter reviews/processing times. It is extremely important that the importer provide all the required information/completed documents as soon as possible in a legible complete format, including:
-
financial statements,
-
ADD/CVD forms,
-
non-reimbursement statements,
-
requests for entry summary copies,
-
collateral requirements,
-
General Indemnity Agreement (GIA) requirements,
-
Collateral Release Policy requirements (CRP), etc.
If the information provided is incomplete, provided in a foreign language (without an accompanying English translation), or not legible, then the underwriters will need to reject the information provided pending receipt of complete, legible information they can review/process.
CBP Insufficiency Notices
If the importer should receive an insufficiency notice from CBP before we have contacted them, the importer should reach out to us (BondDept@anderinger.com) with a copy of the notice they received immediately. While CBP tends to review/issue insufficiency notices early each month, a CBP insufficiency review can occur anytime. The deadlines for actions are detailed in the CBP notice and it is imperative that they are followed or the current bond will be rendered insufficient immediately by CBP and trigger a lapse in bond coverage. It is important to note that CBP insufficiency will not remove the requirement that the current import bond be terminated and replaced with a new import bond. Nor does a CBP insufficiency flag speed up the minimum 16 day term/release process.
We know import bonds are a complex and important topic. Feel free to review our recorded webinar series (part 1 and part 2) that provides bond considerations in detail.
For those customers that use Deringer for their bonds, applications for a new import bond or to terminate/replace your existing bond, please complete this application.
*Note: The minimum turnaround time authorized by CBP to terminate/replace an existing port bond is 16 days from the time CBP receives the termination request for the existing import bond.
Completed applications should be returned to BondDept@anderinger.com.
TOP 5 U.S. IMPORTS FROM MEXICO, CANADA, AND CHINA
Mexico
- Vehicles other than railway, tramway. Examples: Passenger cars and trucks
- Electrical, electronic equipment. Examples: TV receivers, electric heaters
- Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers. Examples: Air conditioners, refrigerators
- Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products. Examples: Cigarette lighters, charcoal
- Optical, photo, technical, medical apparatus. Examples: Surgical instruments, orthopedic equipment, hearing aids
Canada
- Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products. Examples: Peat litter, petroleum jelly
- Vehicles other than railway, tramway. Examples: Cars, car parts
- Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers. Examples: Turbo jets, internal combustion engines
- Unspecified commodities.
- Plastics. Examples: Table and kitchenware
China
- Electrical, electronic equipment. Examples: TV receivers, loudspeakers, headphones
- Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers. Examples: Refrigerators, freezers, dishwashers
- Toys, games, sports requisites. Examples: Toys, sporting equipment
- Furniture, lighting signs, prefabricated buildings. Examples: Lamps, bedding
- Plastics. Examples: floor coverings, tableware